***Please note venue***
$35.00 Late Registration
Integrated Formation Evaluation Using Multiple Geochemical Solutions to Optimize Reservoir Description and Evaluate Production Potential from Multiple Targets in the Northern Delaware Basin.
John Speight1, Todd Passmore1, Bianca Cecconi*2, Placido Franco2, Roberto Galimberti2, Isaac Easow3, Chi Ly3, 1. Marshall & Winston Inc., 2. Geolog Technologies Srl, 3. Geolog Americas
Copyright 2022, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) DOI 10.15530/urtec-2022-3723283
This paper was prepared for presentation at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas, USA, 20-22 June 2022.
The URTeC Technical Program Committee accepted this presentation on the basis of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). The contents of this paper have not been reviewed by URTeC and URTeC does not warrant the accuracy, reliability, or timeliness of any information herein. All information is the responsibility of, and, is subject to corrections by the author(s). Any person or entity that relies on any information obtained from this paper does so at their own risk. The information herein does not necessarily reflect any position of URTeC. Any reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper by anyone other than the author without the written consent of URTeC is prohibited.
With the persistent tightening of global oil and gas costs, operators have been forced to find more economical drilling, completions, and production processes. This trend has impacted the low-budget economics of unconventional producers more so and operators now seek more cost-effective means to understand a reservoir in terms of geology, geochemistry and geomechanics, compared to traditional and more expensive downhole logging tools.
This paper reports an integrated formation evaluation workflow on a multi-well case study in the Northern Delaware Basin using surface logging and laboratory analyses only. We will present how this approach provided subsurface characterization for enabling key drilling and completion decisions and optimizing future well planning and target selections.
A general plan for any field may include a complete set of analyses for a first “training” well. Data acquired are interpreted through a variety of statistical tools to tailor the best technique combination to well planning, drilling and competition strategies for specific targets. Following wells and produced oil samples will then help to refine the applied approach for an overall optimized operational and production strategy. Compositional (C1-C8) and carbon isotope (C1-C3) analyses were carried out on mud gas, while drill cuttings were screened for mineralogy (XRF, XRD) and fluid (thermal-extraction gas chromatography, GC-MS). The integration of data acquired at well-site while drilling and laboratory measurements from both drilling and post well production samples completed the study.
In this study, three potential productive layers, i.e., Avalon, 2nd Bone Spring Sand and 3rd Bone Spring Sand, are investigated in vertical heterogeneities to select optimal landing for laterals, to help refine the completion strategy and give preliminary info on production potential.
Heterogeneities include mineralogy markers, fluid richness, fluid maturity and potentially occurred alterations. A first screening of fluid heterogeneities consists in the use of TE-GC to select the best samples for a deeper investigation through GC-MS. This approach allowed us to observe that the Avalon
has a greater vertical variability in fluid heterogeneity, while the evaluation of 2nd Bone Spring vertical section from the first well allowed to monitor the lateral correlation to fluid properties from a second well.
This case study illustrates how integrating cost-effective analyses on surface samples, such as mud gas, drill cuttings and produced oil, can successfully contribute to reservoir description and future well planning. For example, definition of the fluid heterogeneity along a vertical section can help to plan landing points for lateral drilling; screening the vertical profile could also highlight potential secondary targets in the local area. A hybrid solution of field logging and laboratory characterization is a key factor to maintain low costs while preserving the added value; moreover, the structure of statistical data treatment allows the inclusion of new data when additional wells are drilled, with the potential outcome of progressively reducing the number of necessary analyses and costs.
Isaac Easow joined the oil & gas industry in 1991 as a well-site logging Geologist after completing his Masters in Geology from India. He worked as a field engineer in various oilfield drilling locations in India, SE Asia, Middle East and Africa as a well-site Geologist, formation pressure evaluation Geologist. Since 2006 he joined the formation evaluation team to support real-time drilling monitoring and operations in North America, Latin America and West Africa. Since 2011 he has focused on interpretation and operations support for conventionals and unconventionals in North America as a Domain Champion for formation evaluation providing technical support and real-time Reservoir characterization services, based in Houston Texas. Currently, Isaac is active in promoting and executing reservoir characterization services utilizing advanced surface logging, reservoir fluid characterization, organic and inorganic geochemical techniques for projects in US Onshore, Alaska, and Offshore GOM and Caribbean.